| Update
on Spinal Applications for Recombinant Bone Morphogenetic
Protein-2
Harvinder S. Sandhu, MD(1), Frank P. Cammisa, MD (1),
Stephen E. Heim, MD (2), Edgar G. Dawson, MD(3), Rick B. Delamarter,
MD(3), Eduardo F. Luque, MD(4) 1. New York, 2. Chicago, 3. Los Angeles,
4. Mexico City
Introduction An arthrodesis (fusion) of adjacent vertebral segments of
the spinal column is surgically created in nearly 200,000 patients per
year in the United States. Despite recent technical advances, the
incidence of failure of such intervention is still significant.
Furthermore, substantial amounts of autogenous bone graft must be procured
and transplanted from the ileum to the spine to enable consolidation of a
fusion mass with elements of the spinal column. The additional morbidity
associated with this procedure is well known. Finally, secondary attempts
at spinal fusion following initial failure have even a poorer prognosis
and pose greater challenges.
Advances in spinal fixation devices have addressed
some mechanical considerations. However, osteogenesis and skeletal healing
(fusion consolidation) are biologic processes which are facilitated but
not replaced by instrumented fixation. Recently, considerable attention
has been directed toward biologic considerations and, in particular, novel
growth factors that regulate and promote these biologic processes. This
renewed focus has been a consequence of the successful isolation,
purification, and characterization of an entire family of bone
morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), and the demonstration that a singular
molecular species of recombinant human BMP (rhBMP) could induce the entire
cascade of endochondral osteogenesis. Optimism for using such growth
factors as effective bone-graft substitutes increased following a series
of valuable preclinical animal experiments.
Preclinical Studies with
rhBMPs During the past four years several
investigators have demonstrated that rhBMP-2 and rhBMP-7, combined with
appropriate delivery vehicles, can induce successful posterolateral spinal
fusion in rabbits, dogs, and rhesus monkeys without need for autogenous
bone graft. The fusion rate and strength of fusion mass was equal or
superior to the rate and strength of fusions produced with autogenous
graft from the iliac crest. Cook and associates demonstrated that when
using osteogenic protein-1 (OP-1 or rhBMP-7), posterior lumbar
interlaminar fusions in dogs occurred in 12 weeks compared to 26 weeks
when iliac crest bone was used. Sandhu and David, in separate studies,
reported a 100% rate of lumbar intertransverse process fusion in beagles
within six months of implantation of rhBMP-2 compared to 0% and 33% rate
of fusion with autogenous iliac crest. Boden, using a rabbit lumbar
intertransverse process fusion model with a four week postoperative
endpoint, reported a 100%-fusion rate with rhBMP-2 and a 42%-fusion rate
with autogenous graft.
The efficacy of rhBMP-2 for producing anterior
spinal column fusions was also explored. Sandhu et al demonstrated that
implantation of threaded titanium intervertebral “cages” containing
rhBMP-2 without autograft in a sheep anterior lumbar interbody fusion
(ALIF) model consistently resulted in rapid intervertebral osseous fusion
through the fixation device. Similarly, the same investigators showed that
when rhBMP-2 was added to porous tantalum ALIF cages in the same model,
significantly greater bone ingrowth into the porous macrostructure
occurred.
Data obtained from these lower animal models
prompted further investigation in the higher nonhuman primate model. Boden
et al recently demon-strated the efficacy of rhBMP-2 in a rhesus monkey
ALIF model. Laparoscopic assisted L5-S1 ALIF procedures with threaded,
tapered, titanium cages were performed in seven animals. A type I collagen
sponge carrying a high dose of rhBMP-2, a low dose of rhBMP-2, or no
growth factor was placed into the cage prior to implantation. Animals
implanted with a cage containing rhBMP-2 (high or low dose) all had
successful fusions. The control animals implanted with a cage containing
collagen alone did not fuse. In another recently presented study,
Fishgrund et al reported successful anterior cervical interbody fusions in
a primate model using cadaveric allograft bone dowels filled with rhBMP-2
also carried by a type I collagen sponge. Histologic analysis of the
rhBMP-2 associated cervical fusions revealed complete resorption of the
allograft by six months, an observation not seen when the allograft bone
dowels were filled with autogenous bone graft from the iliac
crest.
Clinical Trials with rhBMP-2 - Early
Observations Based upon the promising
results obtained from the preclinical studies, carefully selected and
controlled clinical trials with rhBMP-2 have begun. Each of the studies is
still in progress and formal interpretation and presentation of the data
has not been performed. Some preliminary observations have been made and
are included in the summary below.
A clinical trial has been designed to examine the
dose-response relationship of rhBMP-2 carried on a fibrillar collagen
vehicle in a human skeletal defect site. A controlled defect is made in
the anterior iliac crest during tricortical bone harvest for anterior
cervical discectomy and fusion. The collagen sponge is implanted in the
iliac-crest site in each case. One of three specific doses of rhBMP-2 in
buffered solution are combined with the collagen sponge prior to
implantation. A soak time of 30 to 90 minutes is used during preparation
of the composite device. A sham condition in which the sponge has not been
combined with the rhBMP-2 is also used. CT examination of the iliac crest
site postoperatively and six months later is performed. The amount of de
novo bone formation is quantitatively analyzed. Early observations in this
ongoing study suggest bone formation in the iliac crest site along the
rhBMP-2/collagen implant (Figs. 1a,b). Comparison of bone formation
associated with the different doses of rhBMP-2, including the sham
condition, has not been completed.
A clinical trial examining the use of a
rhBMP-2/collagen sponge composite combined with a threaded titanium
interbody fusion cage for anterior lumbar interbody fusion has been
completed. No autogenous bone graft was used in any patient. A total of
fourteen patients were enrolled. CT images of the fusions were obtained
three and six months following surgery. These images demonstrated de novo
bone formation within the cages bridging adjacent vertebral segments. Bone
formation anterior, posterior, and lateral to the cages was also noted
(Figs. 2a,b and Figs. 3a,b). Formal evaluation of fusion status and
clinical outcome has not yet been completed.
 |
 |
 |
|
Fig. 3a |
Fig. 3b |
Fig. 4 |
|
(click on thumbnails to view chart)
|
A clinical trial examining the use of rhBMP-2 in
posterior lumbar fusion surgery for the treatment of degenerative disease
of the lumbar spine is underway. Evidence of de novo bone formation
attributable to the growth factor is present in follow-up plain
radiographs of the lumbar spine (Fig. 4). Formal evaluation of these cases
and their outcomes is currently in progress.
Conclusions At this time, evaluations of the
clinical applications of the growth factor rhBMP-2 for the spinal column
are in the earliest stages of study. Early observations suggest that this
growth factor is capable of inducing de novo bone formation in the spinal
environments. Formal examination of these clinical cases, however, is
necessary and pending.
References 1.
Aldinger G, Herr G, Kusswetter W, Reis HJ, Thielemann FW, Holz U: Bone
morphogenetic protein: a review. International Orthopaedics (SICOT)
15:169-177, 1991. 2. Alexander, H, Parsons JR, Weiss AB, Bajpai PK:
Absorbable composites as orthopaedic implants. Trans Soc Biomater 8:215,
1985. 3. Aspenberg P, Wang E, Thorngren KG: Bone morphogenetic protein
induces bone in the squirrel monkey, but bone matrix does not. Proc Ortho
Res Soc 39:101, 1993. 4. Bagby GW: Arthrodesis by the
distraction-compression method using a stainless steel implant.
Orthopedics 11: 931-934, 1988. 5. Boden SD, Schimandle JH, Hutton WC:
An experimental lumbar intertransverse process spinal fusion model. Spine
20:412-420, 1995. 6. Boden, S.D., Horton, W.C., Martin, G., Truss,
T.R., Sandhu, H.S., Laparoscopic Anterior Spinal Arthrodesis with rhBMP-2
in a Titanium Interbody Threaded Cage, presented at theNorth American
Spine Society annual meeting, October 22-25, 1997, New York, New
York. a) Bostrom M, Lane JM, Tomin E, Browne M, Berberian W, Turek T,
Smith J, Wozney J, Schildhauer T: Use of bone morphogenetic protein-2 in
the rabbit ulnar nonunion model Clin Orthop 1996 Jun;327:272-282 b)
Boyne PJ c)Animal studies of application of rhBMP-2 in maxillofacial
reconstruction. Bone 1996 19(1 Suppl):83S-92S 7. Callewart CC, Kanim
LEA, Seeger LL, Dawson EG: Variable fusion rates in the canine model.
Presented at the 29th Annual Meeting of the Scoliosis Research Society,
Portland, Oregon, 21-24 September, 1994. 8. Crawley GR, Grant BD, White
KK, Barbee DD, Gallina RM, Ratzlaff MH: A modified Cloward’s technique for
arthrodesis of the normal metacarpophalangeal joint in the horse. Vet Surg
17(3):117-127, 1988. 9. Cook SD, Baffes GC, Wolfe MW, Sampath TK,
Rueger DC, Whitecloud 3rd TS: The effect of recombinant human osteogenic
protein-1 on healing of large segmental bone defects. J Bone Joint Surg
[Am] 76-A: 827-838, 1994. 10. Cook SD, Dalton JE, Tan EH, Whitecloud
3rd TS, Rueger DC: In vivo evaluation of recombinant human osteogenic
protein (rhOP-1) implants as a bone graft substitute for spinal fusions.
Spine 19:1655-1663, 1994. 11. Cox KA, Holtrop M, D’Alessandro JS, Wang
EA, Wozney JM, Rosen V: Histological and ultrastructural comparison of the
in vivo activities of rhBMP-2 and rhBMP-5. J Bone Min Res 6:S155,
1991. 12. Damien CJ, Parsons JR: Bone graft and bone graft substitutes.
A review of current technology and applications. Journal of Applied
Biomaterials 2:187-208, 1991. 13. David SM, Murakami T, Tabor OB, Meyer
RA Jr, Howard B, Gruber, HE, Hanley EN Jr.: Lumbar spinal fusion using
recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein (rhBMP-2): A randomized,
blinded and controlled study. ISSLS, 1995, pp 14. 14. Feiertag MA,
Boden SD, Schimandle JH, Norman JT: A rabbit model for nonuniou of lumbar
intertransverse process spine arthrodesis. Spine 21(1) 27:31, 1996. 15.
Ferguson D, Davis WL, Urist MR, Hurt WC, Allen EP: Bovine bone
morphogenetic protein (bBMP) fraction- induced repair of craniotomy
defects in the rhesus monkey (Macaca speciosa). Clin Orthop 219: 251-258,
1987. 16. Friedenstein AJ, Petrakova KV, Kurolesova AI, Frolova GP:
Heterotopic transplants of bone marrow. Analysis of precursor cells for
osteogenic and haemopoietic tissues. Transplantation 6:230-247,
1968. a) Gerhart TN, Kirker-Head CA, Kriz MJ, Holtrop ME, Hennig GE,
Hipp J, Schelling SH, Wang E: Healing segmental femoral defects in sheep
using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein. Clin Orthop 293:
317-326, 1993. b) Goldberg VM, Stevenson S, Shaffer JW: Biology of
autografts and allografts. In: Friedlander GE, Goldberg, VM, eds. Bone and
cartilage allografts. Illinois: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons,
1991: pp 3-12. 17. Heckman JD, Boyan BD, Aufdemorte TB, Abbott JT: The
use of bone morphogenetic protein in the treatment of non-union in a
canine model. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 73:750-64, 1991. 18. Hecht, BP,
Fischgrund, JS, Herkowitz, HN, Penman L, Toth J, The Use of rhBMP-2 to
Promote Spinal Fusion in a Non-Human Primate Anterior Interbody Fusion
Model, presented at the North American Spine Society annual meeting,
October 22-25, New York, New York. a) Holliger EH, Trawick RH, Boden
SD, Hutton WC Morphology of the lumbar intertransverse process fusion mass
in the rabbit model: a comparison between two bone graft materials—rhBMP-2
and autograft. J Spinal Disord 1996 Apr;9(2):125-128 19. Johnson EE,
Urist MR, Finerman, GA: Bone morphogenetic protein augmentation grafting
of resistant femoral nonunions. Clin Orthop 230:257-65, 1988. 20.
Johnson EE, Urist MR, Finerman, GA: Repair of segmental defects of the
tibia with cancellous bone grafts augmented with human bone morphogenetic
protein. Clin Orthop 236:249-257, 1988. 21. Lane JM, Cornell CN, Werntz
JR, Sandhu HS. Clinical applications of biosynthetics. In: Friedlander GE,
Goldberg, VM, eds. Bone and cartilage allografts. Illinois: American
Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 1991:pp 279-94. 22.Lee SC, Shea M,
Battle MA, Kozitza K, Ron E, Turek T, Schaub RG, Hayes WC: Healing of
large segmental defects in rat femurs is enhanced by rhBMP-2 in a PLGA
matrix: a torsional and densitometric assessment. Journal of Biomedical
Materials Research 28(10):1149-1156, 1994. 23. Lovell TP, Dawson EG,
Nilsson OS, Urist MR. Augmentation of spinal fusion with bone
morphogenetic protein in dogs. Clin Orthop 243:266-74, 1989. 24. Lucas
PA, Syftestad GT, Goldberg VM, Caplan AI: Ectopic induction of cartilage
and bone by water-soluble proteins from bovine bone using a collagenous
delivery vehicle. J Biomed Mater Res 23(A1 suppl):23-39, 1989. 25.
Luyten FP, Cunningham NS, Vukicevic S, Paralkar V, Ripamonti U, Reddi AH:
Advances in osteogenin and related bone morphogenetic proteins in bone
induction and repair. Acta Orthopaedica Begica 58 (suppl. 1): 263-268,
1992. 26. Miyamoto S, Takaoka K, Okada T, Yoshikawa H, Hashimoto J,
Suzuki S, Ono K: Evaluation of polylactic acid homopolymers as carriers
for bone morphogenetic protein. Clin Orthop 278: 274-286, 1992. 27.
Mizutani H, Urist MR: The nature of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)
fractions derived from bovine bone matrix gelatin. Clin Orthop 171:213-23,
1982. a) Muschler GF, Hyodo A, Manning T, Kambic H, Easley K Evaluation
of human bone morphogenetic protein 2 in a canine spinal fusion model Clin
Orthop 308:229-240, 1994 b) Muschler GF, Lane JM, Dawson EG: The
Biology of Spinal Fusion. In: Cotler JM, Cotler HB, eds. Spinal Fusion:
Science and Technique. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1990: pp 9-21. 28.
Nilsson OS, Urist MR, Dawson EG, Schmalzried TP, Finerman GA: Bone repair
induced by bone morphogenetic protein in ulnar defects in dogs. J Bone
Joint Surg [Br] 68:635-42, 1986. 29. Reddi AH, Bone morphogenetic
proteins, bone marrow stromal cells, and mesenchymal stem cells: Maureen
Owen Revisited. Clinical Ortho 313:115-119, 1995. a) Sandhu HS, Kanim
LE, Kabo JM, Toth JM, Zeegen EN, Liu D, Delamarter RB, Dawson EG Effective
doses of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 in experimental
spinal fusion. Spine 21(18):2115-2122, 1996 30. Sandhu HS, Kanim LEA,
Kabo JM, Zeegen EN, Liu D, Seeger LL, Dawson EG: Evaluation of rhBMP-2
with an OPLA carrier in a canine posterolateral (transverse process)
spinal fusion model. Spine 20 (24):2669- 26820000-0000, 1995. a) Sandhu
HS, Kanim LE, Toth JM, Kabo JM, Liu D, Delamarter RB, Dawson EG
Experimental spinal fusion with recombinant human bone morphogenetic
protein-2 without decortication of osseous elements. Spine
22(11):1171-1180, 1997 31. Sandhu HS, Ozuna R, Kanim LEA, Kabo JM, Toth
JM, Liu D, Delamarter RB, Dawson EG. Carriers for BMP for posterolateral
spinal fusion.. Presented at the 10th Annual Meeting of the North American
Spine Society, Washington, D.C., October, 18-21, 1995, pp 14. 32.
Schimandle JH, Boden SD, Hutton WC: Experimental spinal fusion with
recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2. Spine 20(12) 1326-1337,
1995. 33. Silcox DH, Boden SD, Schimandle JH, Whitesides TE, Hutton
WC: Reversing the inhibitory effect of nicotine on spinal fusion using an
osteoinductive bone protein extract. Presented at the 10th Annual Meeting
of the North American Spine Society, Washington, D.C., October, 18-21,
1995, pp 3. 34. Simmons DJ, Calhoun JH, Zimmerman B, Brantley J, Mader
JT. Effect of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein (rhBMP-2) on
the healing of cortical bone in the rabbit tibia. Proc Ortho Res Soc 40:
507, 1994. 35. Tencer AF, Hampton D, Eddy S: Biomechanical properties
of threaded inserts for lumbar interbody spinal fusion. Spine 20(2):
2408-2414, 1995. 36. Urist MR, DeLange RJ, Finerman GA: Bone cell
differentiation and growth factors. Science 220:680- 86, 1983. 37.
Urist MR, Granstein R, Nogami H, Svenson L, Murphy R: Transmembrane bone
morphogenesis across multiple-walled diffusion chambers. Arch Surg
(112):612-620, 1977. 38. Urist MR, Lietze A, Dawson EG, Finerman GAM:
Bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) delivery system. Presented at the 11th
Annual Meeting of the Society for Bioimaterials, San Diego, California,
April 25-28, 1985. 39. Urist MR, Mikulski A, Lietze A: Solubilized and
insolubilized bone morphogenetic protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
76:1828-1832, 1979. 40. Urist MR: Bone: Formation by autoinduction.
Science 150:893-899, 1965. 41. Urist MR: Bone morphogenetic protein.
In: Habal MB, Reddi AH, eds. Bone Grafts and Bone Substitutes.
Philadelphia. W.B. Saunders Company, 1992:3-8, pp 376. 42. Urist MR:
The search for and discovery of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP). In:
Urist MR, O’Conner BT, Burwell RG (eds.) Bone Grafts, Derivatives and
Substitutes. London: Butterworth Heinemann, 1994: pp 315-362. 43. Wang
EA, Rosen V, Cordes P, et al: Purification and characterization of other
distinct bone-inducing factors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85(24):9484-9488,
1988. 44. Wang EA, Rosen V, D’Alessandro JS, et al: Recombinant human
bone morphogenetic protein induces bone formation. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA
87(6):2220-2224, 1990. 45. Wilder DG, Grobler LJ, Oxland T, Ahern JW:
Mechanical efficacy of the BAK interbody fusion system: Simulated pre- and
post-operative conditions in a Chagma baboon. International Society for
the Study of the Lumbar Spine, 1993:132. 46. Wozney JM, Rosen V,
Celeste AJ, et al: Novel regulators of bone formation: Molecular clones
and activities. Science 242:1528-34, 1988. 47. Wozney JM: The bone
morphogenetic protein family and osteogenesis. Molecular Repro and Dev
32(2):160-7, 1992. 48. Yasko AW, Lane JM, Fellinger EJ, Rosen V, Wozney
JM, Wang EA: The healing of segmental bone defects, induced by recombinant
human bone morphogenetic protein (rhBMP-2). J Bone Joint Surg [Am]
74(5)-A:659-671, 1992. 49. Zdeblick, TA, Cooke, ME, Rapoff, AJ, Swain,
C, Markel, MD, Ghanayem, AJ: Cervical Interbody Fusion Cages, an animal
model with and without BMP. Presented at the 10th Annual Meeting of the
North American Spine Society, Washington, D.C., October, 18-21, 1995, pp
10.
|